“Orissa High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Child Rape and Murder Case, Citing Principles of Justice and Rehabilitation”

June25(3)

“Orissa High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Child Rape and Murder Case, Citing Principles of Justice and Rehabilitation”

By Shazia Siddiqui

In a distressing case involving the rape and murder of a six-year-old girl, the Orissa High Court recently commuted the death sentence of one of the convicted individuals, Sk. Asif Alli. This decision reflects a nuanced consideration of both legal principles and the personal circumstances of the convicted. The case, marked by harrowing details and a focus on justice, underscores the court’s approach to punishment and rehabilitation.

On August 21, 2014, a tragic incident unfolded in a small village when a young girl, accompanied by her minor cousin, went missing while returning from a local shop. Despite frantic searches by her family and villagers, the girl was found later, naked and unconscious, in the home of Sk. Khairuddin. She was immediately taken to a primary healthcare center, where the attending doctor suspected she had been raped and throttled. Her condition rapidly deteriorated, necessitating a transfer to SCB Medical College and Hospital in Cuttack. Tragically, she succumbed to her injuries en route.

The victim’s cousin later revealed that Sk. Asif Alli and Sk. Akil Alli had forcibly taken her away. Following this disclosure, the victim’s aunt filed an FIR, and the subsequent police investigation led to a charge sheet against Sk. Asif Alli, Sk. Akil Alli, and two others. The trial court ultimately found them guilty, convicting Sk. Asif Alli and Sk. Akil Alli under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The trial court imposed a death sentence on the grounds of the gravity of the crime.

Upon appeal, the Orissa High Court reassessed the evidence and legal arguments. The Bench scrutinized the trial court’s findings and noted significant points regarding the evidence and the defendants’ conduct. For Sk. Akil Alli, the High Court concluded that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction. Consequently, he was acquitted of all charges under sections 302, 376-A, and 376-D of the IPC, as well as Section 6 of the POCSO Act.

In contrast, while the Court upheld Sk. Asif Alli’s conviction for rape and murder under sections 302 and 376-A of the IPC, and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, it acquitted him of the gang rape charge under section 376-D. The Court emphasized that the case against Sk. Asif Alli was based largely on circumstantial evidence, and there was no material indicating that the crime was premeditated.

The High Court’s decision to commute the death sentence of Sk. Asif Alli to life imprisonment was influenced by several factors. Central to their reasoning was the principle that punishment should not be disproportionately severe relative to the crime. The Court observed that Sk. Asif Alli showed signs of remorse and a willingness to accept punishment, as evidenced by his frequent prayers and his expressed readiness to surrender to divine justice.

Moreover, the Court highlighted that there was no compelling evidence that Sk. Asif Alli was beyond the possibility of reform or rehabilitation. The judges underscored that, while the crime was indeed heinous and the impact on the victim and her family was profound, the imposition of the death penalty should be reserved for cases where life imprisonment would be wholly inadequate. They noted that although the victim’s cousin, who witnessed the crime, did not suffer physical harm, the psychological impact on the community and the victim’s family was significant.

The Court stated that the punishment must align with the criminal conduct and not extend beyond what is deserved. This reflection on justice and proportionality guided their decision to replace the death sentence with a term of life imprisonment for Sk. Asif Alli, thereby affirming the legal principle that the justice system should strive for balanced and fair retribution.

The Court’s ruling serves as a poignant reminder of the complexity involved in adjudicating cases of such severe nature, where justice must balance the need for punishment with the possibility of redemption and reform.

Case Title: Sk. Asif Alli @ Md. Asif Iqbal & Anr. vs State of Odisha

Citation: DSREF No.01 of 2022 

Click here to read/Download the judgement